Most evaluations end with a written diagnostic summary, sometimes delivered immediately and sometimes after a follow-up session. Reports vary in length and format, but they tend to share a few elements.
You'll typically see a statement of which DSM-5-TR criteria were met, the presentation type if a diagnosis is made, a sense of severity, a description of how symptoms affect your functioning, the conditions that were considered and ruled out, and recommendations for next steps.
Presentation type is one of the labels that can feel confusing on first read. NIMH describes three ADHD presentation types — predominantly inattentive, predominantly hyperactive-impulsive, and combined — based on which symptom cluster is most prominent. None of those labels is a verdict on your character. They are clinical shorthand for which patterns showed up most clearly during the evaluation, and they help guide what kinds of support tend to work best.
Severity is usually noted as mild, moderate, or severe, and reflects how much daily impairment your symptoms are causing rather than how "real" the ADHD is. The functional impact section of the report is often the most useful part to revisit later, because it puts language to the way ADHD is showing up in your work, relationships, finances, or self-care.
If anything in the report is unclear, asking for a follow-up conversation to review it is reasonable and common. Reports are written for accuracy, not for plain-language clarity, and a clinician walking you through it can be genuinely useful.